Subject	Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about
Posted by	treese88 on September 01, 2011 at 12:01 PM
	This message has been viewed 159 times.
In Reply To	Injector Latency for 555s posted by Stadsport (PHX) on August 31, 2011 at 06:39 PM
Message	the norm for Nismo injectors. With any load latency barely effects my a/f values. If I am to go into Nistune and change latency from say 790 to 850 my idle will go go about .5 a/f richer (off the top of my head...haven't done that in awhile + I'm running shitty DW injectors so results may vary). Moral of the story is if the only difference between the tunes is latency, pick the tune that gives you a smoother idle. '91 TT
Follow Ups	Injector Latency for 555s - Stadsport (PHX) 18:39:51 08/31/11 Niether is "better" - sandmanz32 20:13:32 08/31/11 Latency... not pulsewidth... (n/m) - Stadsport (PHX) 21:01:29 08/31/11 2 terms for the same thing - sandmanz32 10:32:37 09/01/11 Not really.. - Stadsport (PHX) 15:12:02 09/01/11 Interesting - sandmanz32 18:50:39 09/02/11 Re: Interesting - Stadsport (PHX) 21:32:41 09/02/11 Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about - treese88 12:01:17 09/01/11 correct (n/m) - The Devils Z 14:35:09 09/01/11 Re: Latency mainly effects idle and I believe .77ms is about - Stadsport (PHX) 15:14:06 09/01/11 By the way... - Stadsport (PHX) 15:18:59 09/01/11 I believe 740s are still closer to .77ms. A rich idle - treese88 09:43:33 09/02/11 I'll stick to .77ms then - Stadsport (PHX) 21:35:17 09/02/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.